AcquaPortal Forum Acquario Dolce e Acquario Marino

AcquaPortal Forum Acquario Dolce e Acquario Marino (http://www.acquariofilia.biz/forum.php)
-   Riproduzione nell'acquario marino (http://www.acquariofilia.biz/forumdisplay.php?f=177)
-   -   Allevamento fitoplancton (http://www.acquariofilia.biz/showthread.php?t=54434)

*Tuesen!* 17-09-2006 22:34

Quote:

A proposito di benefici del cibo vivo.
Questa mattinami chiama Filippo dicendomi che ha la vasca invasa da uova.
Anch'io stamani avevo la vasca invasa da uova e non somministro niente di vivo....secondo me è la stagione degli amori altro che phito e zoo..... ;-)

Modder 17-09-2006 22:36

Quote:

un'ora di buio, questo perchè la divisione cellulare si ha prevalentemente durante il buio
allora perchè fare un'esposizione di 24 ore?

Simone 17-09-2006 22:36

:-D

*Tuesen!* 17-09-2006 22:42

:-)) pensa te, skimmer bloccato per mezza giornata e vasca piena di minuscole uova.......e un'odore pungente per tutta la stanza.....e ti giuro le uniche cose vive che ci sono sono quelle dentro la vasca. Tra l'altro sono frequentissimi questi casi anche in sistemi in cui venivano usati papponi e surrogati quindi non legherei il fatto di somministrare cibo vivo al fenomeno dell'emissione di uova. IMHO :-))

Mat 18-09-2006 14:14

Qualcosa su cui meditare :-)) :-))

Quote:

There are a couple of points in this discussion that I feel the need to address:

1) Shops selling phytoplankton as coral food - most research that I have read involving feeding in stony corals deals mainly with the ingestion of ZOOplankton. Soft corals, particularly azooxanthellate ones such as Dendronephthya have been shown to feed on phytoplankton. This makes sense to me since most of these corals lack nematocysts and their polyp structures appear to be more suited for sieving food from passing water than stinging and capturing it as can be seen in stony corals which all seem to have nematocysts ... why sting a phytoplankton cell to capture it which is basically a passive entity unlike a struggling copepod?

I have a pet theory that people who report responses from corals when fed phytoplankton could be seeing the result of any number of factors such as the addition of nutrients, the decay of phytoplankton leading to increased nitrogen and phosphorous levels, to the increase in filter feeders and hence, an increase in reproduction of these i.e. more zooplankton being generated.

2) Feeding vs. non-feeding of corals in captivity - yes corals will feed on zooplankton and more meaty food in the case of corals with polyps large enough to take them. No one disputes this. What is in question is do corals in captivity need this? Given that nitrogen, phosphorous and organic nutrient levels are generally several times that found on natural reefs is this enough to keep the corals "happy"? The success of aquarists in Europe with stony and soft corals in the 1970s and 1980s, without any feeding, would tend to support this idea.

3) The role of dissolved nutrients - The Waikiki Aquarium has been keeping, propagating and spawning stony corals, mainly Acropora, Montipora etc since the late 1970s. We have never added any sort of zooplankton or phytoplankton to our systems. We use a saltwater well as a water source for the majority of our exhibit and they are semi-open systems. The well is 80ft down in coral rock, the chemistry of this water has been discussed in Atkinson et al. 1995, there is no zooplankton or phytoplankton in this water. That is not to say that there isn't any bacteria in the water, or that there could be plankton being generated in the systems themselves. All I can say with absolute certainty is that WE do not feed the corals. Yet, we have observed the release of eggs, sperm and egg/sperm bundles in corals such as Acropora, Sandalolitha, Montipora, Euphyllia and Goniopora. What our water IS rich in is nitrogen, phoshporous, iron, managense, carbon dioxide etc. ... so my feeling is that the zooxanthellae and perhaps the coral tissue itself, is getting more than enough of what they need from the water.

...

Finally, I think one needs to be cautious about making sweeping generalizations about what corals need or don't need in terms of feeding when it is becoming increasingly obvious that the corals have various abilities to gather, use and process sources of nutrition spread across the genera.

Aloha!

J. Charles Delbeek M.Sc.
Aquarium Biologist III
Waikiki Aquarium,
University of Hawaii

rveronico 18-09-2006 14:43

Gia'.. quello che dice Charles Delbeek è che nel loro acquario, The Waikiki Aquarium, che alleva e riproduce con successo coralli, non introducono ne' fito ne' zoo plancton.
Pero' dice anche:
We use a saltwater well as a water source for the majority of our exhibit and they are semi-open systems.
Ossia, se capisco bene, introducono direttamente acqua di mare e si tratta di sistemi semi aperti.. cosa non vera in genere per le nostre vasche...
Ciao
Rob.

Mat 18-09-2006 14:48

Correttissimo. Però dice anche:

2) Feeding vs. non-feeding of corals in captivity - yes corals will feed on zooplankton and more meaty food in the case of corals with polyps large enough to take them. No one disputes this. What is in question is do corals in captivity need this? Given that nitrogen, phosphorous and organic nutrient levels are generally several times that found on natural reefs is this enough to keep the corals "happy"? The success of aquarists in Europe with stony and soft corals in the 1970s and 1980s, without any feeding, would tend to support this idea.

....

Dico solo che questo ci deve far riflettere.

Pfft 18-09-2006 14:52

Mat, perfettamente d'accordo... ma quanti passi avanti si sono fatti da quando è stato scoperto che le Acropore e gli altri coralli mangiano ?

Comunque a me il phyto serve come cibo.. e almeno personalmente non ho mai sostenuto che serva alle acro... che sono principalmente carnivore... a me serve per "altro".

franklin 18-09-2006 14:52

modder,secondo me ti fai troppe seghe mentali.....se uno vuole far stare il fito in vasca sbicchiera lo schimmer,punto absta...ma che flebo e e elettrovalvole....poi la skimmer non si spenge mai,al limite si sbicchiera ma spengerlo no,diminuisci drasticamente gli scambi gassosi.

Mat 18-09-2006 15:02

...volevo solo che le argomentazioni di Delbeck fossero prese in considerazione. A mio parere ha tanto ragione. Ma poco importa.

spero che i moderatori non se la prendano se vi indirizzo a questo link (di un altro forum) perché ci sono moltissimi ulteriori link a pagine web dove si spiega come allevare cibo vivo. Nel caso fosse un problema, chiedo ai moderatori di eliminare il link...

Credo che le info siano molto utili per questa discussione.

Anche il post è interessante. Come sempre quando scrive mesososm.

http://www.zeovit.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4796


Ciao


Tutti gli orari sono GMT +2. Attualmente sono le 10:06.

Powered by vBulletin versione 3.8.9
Copyright ©: 2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Traduzione italiana Team: AcquaPortal
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.2.5 Patch Level 2 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright Zero Pixel Srl

Page generated in 0,08805 seconds with 13 queries